TAX LEARNING INNOVATION: UPGRADING CRITICAL THINKING AND SELF-EFFICACY LEVEL OF PROSPECTIVE TAX CONSULTANTS

  • NURCAHYANING DWI KUSUMANINGRUM UNIVERSITAS JEMBER
  • Sari Dewi Poerwanti UNIVERSITAS JEMBER
  • Nurina Adi Paramitha UNIVERSITAS JEMBER
  • Sukron Makmun UNIVERSITAS JEMBER
Keywords: critical thinking skills, tax con-sultant candidates, SCT, self-efficacy

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 401 times

Abstract

Prospective tax consultants must have competent critical thinking skills. However, critical thinking skills and self-efficacy levels for prospective tax consultants are still low. The problem-based learning (PBL) model has been widely implemented to improve students' critical thinking skills and efficacy. However, weaknesses were found, such as the need to increase self-efficacy and investigative processes based on scientific process skills. Therefore, innovation was created to develop scientific critical thinking (SCT). Learning model based on the strengths and weaknesses of the PBL model. This innovation is also supported by theory and empirical studies. This study functions as a preliminary study in the process of developing the SCT learning model to improve the critical thinking skills and self-efficacy of prospective tax consultants. This research includes needs analysis, a literature review, and a field survey. The results show that innovation can serve as a basis for developing a hypothetical SCT learning model. The syntactic SCT learning model includes: student orientation, scientific activities, presentation of the results of scientific activities, critical completion of thinking tasks, and evaluation. The hypothetical SCT learning model must be tested to meet the aspects of validity, practicality, and effectiveness to improve the critical thinking skills and self-efficacy of tax consultant candidates.

References

[1.] Abidin, Z. (2016). Application of learning media selection. Edcomtech, 1(1), 9-20.
[2.] Ananda, R., & Fadhli, M. (2018). Educational statistics: theory and practice in education.
[3.] Barus, EL, & Sani, RA (2018). The influence of the inquiry learning model on student learning outcomes on the main material of business and energy in class x semester ii. INPAFI (Physics Learning Innovation), 5(4).
[4.] Brookhart, S. M. (2010). Assess higher order thinking skills. Alexandria: ASCD Publications.
[5.] Budiyono. 2009. Statistics for Research 2nd Edition. Sebelas Maret University Press: Surakarta.
[6.] Handayani, SL (2018, July). Evaluating PGSD Students' Conceptions and Misconceptions of Optical Geometry Material Using a Three-Level Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. In Proceedings of the National Education Seminar (Vol. 1, No. 1).
[7.] Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
[8.] Lin, K. M., & Leng, L. W. (2008, July). Using problem-posing as an assessment tool. In 10th Asia-Pacific Conference on Giftedness, Singapore (pp. 1-15).
[9.] Angraeni, L. (2021, November). The influence of problem based learning model and critical thinking ability on higher order thinking skills (HOTs) of prospective physics teachers students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2104, No. 1, p. 012007). IOP Publishing.
[10.] Prasetyani, E., Hartono, Y., & Susanti, E. (2016). High-level thinking abilities of class XI students in problem-based trigonometry learning at SMA Negeri 18 Palembang. Gantang Journal, 1(1), 34-44.
[11.] Rahayu, S., & Hidayat, A. (2017). Application of the problem based learning (PBL) learning model to the critical thinking abilities of class X Science students at SMAN 1 Sukawangi on environmental pollution material. ilib. uinsgd. air conditioning. id, (1), 1-8.
[12.] Sheftyawan, WB, Prihandono, T., & Lesmono, AD (2018). Identify student misconceptions using a four-tier diagnostic test on geometric optics material. Journal of Physics Learning, 7(2), 147-153.
[13.] Sofyan, H., & Komariah, K. (2016). Problem based learning in implementing the 2013 curriculum in vocational schools. Journal of Vocational Education, 6(3), 260-271.
[14.] Surapranata, S. (2019). Analysis, validity, reliability and interpretation of the 2004 curriculum implementation test results.
[15.] Ulfa, SW (2014). The Influence of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on Higher Level Thinking Abilities (Analyzing, Evaluating, Creating) and Science Process Skills of STIPAP LPP Medan Students (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED).
[16.] Wahid, S. (2005). Non-Parametric Statistics case examples and solutions using SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi. Wijnen
[17.] Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M., & van der Molen, H. (2017). Comparing problem-based learning students to students in a lecture-based curriculum: learning strategies and the relationship with self-study time. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32, 431-447..
[18.] Wulandari, PA (2019). Substitute for Criminal Fines in Tax Crimes (Doctoral dissertation, AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY).
Published
2024-06-23
How to Cite
KUSUMANINGRUM, N. D., Sari Dewi Poerwanti, Nurina Adi Paramitha, & Sukron Makmun. (2024). TAX LEARNING INNOVATION: UPGRADING CRITICAL THINKING AND SELF-EFFICACY LEVEL OF PROSPECTIVE TAX CONSULTANTS. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Dan Ilmu Ekonomi (Jasmien), 4(04), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.54209/jasmien.v4i03.509