THE USE OF THE AHP AND TOPSIS METHODS IN ANALYZING THE SELECTION OF THE BEST CRYPTO (CASE STUDY: BITCOIN AND SOLANA)

  • Arizka Anggraini Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Abdul Halim Hasugian Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Keywords: AHP, TOPSIS, Bitcoin, Solana, Cryptocurrency

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 255 times

Abstract

The development of digital financial technology has introduced a variety of crypto assets with different characteristics and mechanisms, necessitating an objective analytical approach to determine the most optimal asset. This research aims to identify the best crypto between Bitcoin and Solana by considering five main criteria: transaction speed, transaction cost, energy consumption, network security, and network stability. The approach used is descriptive quantitative with the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the weight of each criterion and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to rank the alternatives based on the obtained weights. Data was collected through a literature review and official sources from each crypto platform to ensure the validity and reliability of the results. Based on the analysis, Solana obtained the highest preference value as it showed significant superiority in transaction speed, cost efficiency, and low energy consumption, while Bitcoin remains superior in the aspect of more assured network security and stability. The combination of the AHP and TOPSIS methods proved capable of producing a systematic, rational, and measurable multi-criteria decision-making process. The results of this study have implications for the development of a data-driven digital asset evaluation model, which can serve as a reference for investors, market analysts, and researchers in conducting comparative assessments of crypto asset performance more efficiently, transparently, and based on empirical evidence, in line with the increasing need for analytical instruments in modern financial technology investment.

References

Annisa Fitria. (2021). Bitcoin dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, Volume 18(Nomor 2). https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/public/UEU-Journal-22472-11_2038.pdf
Arianto, D., Sundari, D., & Rusda, D. (2024). Penerapan Metode AHP dan SAW dalam Pemilihan Bibit Unggul Kepala Sawit di Desa Derawa. 10(2), 567–583.
Dewi, W., & Siahaan, R. F. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jenis Tanaman Karet Untuk Menghasilkan Bibit Tanaman Karet Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Topsis. Jurnal Nasional Komputasi Dan Teknologi Informasi (JNKTI), 4(6), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.32672/jnkti.v4i6.3574
Fitriani, F., As’ad, I., & Kurniati, N. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Padi Unggul Menggunakan Metode Topsis Tehnique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution. Buletin Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi Islam, 3(4), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.33096/busiti.v3i4.1446
Irawan, M. D., Fasya, M. R., Islam, U., Sumatera, N., & Utara, S. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Aplikasi AHP-TOPSIS Combination for Selection of the Best Lecturers Based on the SINTA Metric. 1–12.
Ivander, F., Siwy, D., Dharmawan, M. S., & Mayatopani, H. (2023). JTIM : Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia Penggunaan Metode AHP dalam Menentukan Cryptocurrency. 5(2).
Khusna, I. M., & Mariana, N. (2021). Jurnal SISFOKOM (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), Volume 10, Nomor 02, PP 162 -169 Sistem. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Padi Berkualitas Dengan Metode AHP Dan Topsis, 10(2), 162–169.
Refina Afindania, P., Defit, S., & Sumijan. (2024). Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Alat Kontrasepsi Dengan Metode Ahp Dan Topsis (Studi Kasus Di Puskesmas Gunung Labu). Jurnal Teknoif Teknik Informatika Institut Teknologi Padang, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21063/jtif.2024.v12.1.1-9
Ridho, M. R., Hairani, H., Latif, K. A., & Hammad, R. (2021). Kombinasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Beasiswa SMK Berbasis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Jurnal Tekno Kompak, 15(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v15i1.905
Rivaldi, D., Pulansari, F., & Kartika, A. P. (2023). Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Baut Menggunakan Metode Ahp-Topsis Pt. Stechoq Robotika Indonesia. J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 18(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.18.2.79-87
Rohman, M. N. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Regulasi Mata Uang Kripto (Crypto Currency) di Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi, 11(April 2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v11i2.1284
Siregar, J. and A. A. and A. W. A. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Dengan Metode Ahp Dan Topsis. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 1(10), 1273–1284.
Suhardi, S., Hasibuan, M. S., Nasution, E., & Rafisyah, I. (2021). Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Dan Analyctical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Dalam Menentukan Rekomendasi Shuttlecock Badminton Terbaik. JISTech (Journal of Islamic Science and Technology), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.30829/jistech.v6i2.11072
Sulistiani, H., Adji, U., Maryana, S., & Setiawansyah. (2023). KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Memilih Bibit Kedelai Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode TOPSIS dan ROC. Media Online, 4(3), 1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i3.1339
Syaputra, A. (2021). Kombinasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Bibit Sayuran Berdasarkan Kondisi Tanah dan Syarat Tumbuh Tanaman. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika, 6(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.35316/jimi.v6i1.1232
Published
2025-10-28
How to Cite
Anggraini, A., & Hasugian, A. H. (2025). THE USE OF THE AHP AND TOPSIS METHODS IN ANALYZING THE SELECTION OF THE BEST CRYPTO (CASE STUDY: BITCOIN AND SOLANA). Jurnal Multimedia Dan Teknologi Informasi (Jatilima), 7(03), 748-753. https://doi.org/10.54209/jatilima.v7i03.1757