PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS

  • Lintang Caesar Pangestu Universitas Gresik
  • Zakiah Noer Universitas Gresik
  • Dara Puspitasari Universitas Gresik
Keywords: Minority Shareholders. Special Rights. Fiduciary Duty. Law No. 40 of 2007. Good Corporate Governance. Business Judgment Rule. Derivative Action.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 126 times

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal reconstruction of minority shareholder protection under Law No. 40 of 2007 in Indonesia, focusing on special rights and fiduciary duties. Using normative legal research with statute and case approaches, the study identifies a disconnect between formal regulations and substantive justice, often leading to "abuse of majority," as seen in the PT Sumalindo Lestari Jaya Tbk case. Findings indicate that shareholders below the 10% threshold remain vulnerable due to information asymmetry and high litigation costs. To strengthen Good Corporate Governance (GCG), this research proposes a systemic restructuring: lowering derivative suit thresholds, granting explicit legal recognition to Shareholders' Agreements (SHA), and mandating cumulative voting. Additionally, optimizing fiduciary duty enforcement requires clearer judicial interpretations of the Business Judgment Rule and the expansion of the "piercing the corporate veil" doctrine. These reforms are vital to mitigate oppressive majority actions and enhance the global competitiveness of Indonesian corporations.

References

Adi Surya Wijaya (2025) Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Minoritas di UU PT, ILS Law Firm. Available at: https://www.ilslawfirm.co.id/perlindungan-hukum-pemegang-saham-minoritas-2/.

Agus Riyanto, M.C. (2021) PELANGGARAN-PELANGGARAN PT. SUMALINDO LESTARI JAYA TBK DAN KRITIK TERHADAP PASAL 138 – 141 UUPT, Faculty of Humanities Binus University. Available at: https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2021/03/18/pelanggaran-pelanggaran-pt-sumalindo-lestari-jaya-tbk-dan-kritik-terhadap-pasal-138-141-uupt-part-ii/.

Cesaria, B.D.R. (2025) “Begawan Abioso Memahami Fiduciary Duty Direksi Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia : Studi Perbandingan dengan Hukum,” Begawan Abioso, 16(1).

Delano Sumurung Haposan (2010) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK-HAK DERIVATIVE ACTION PADA PERSEROAN TERBATAS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE “ SUATU KAJIAN DARI SUDUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS ” TESIS JAKARTA. Universitas Indonesia.

Dimas Andhika Anindhita, R Kartikasari, Anita Afriana (2020) “PADA PELAKSANAAN GO PRIVATE DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERSEROAN TERBUKA Dimas Andhika Anindhita , Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran , Bandung , berkembang seolah tak berhenti , dengan menawarkan tingkat return yang bervarias,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad, 3(2), pp. 189–202.

I Kadek Sridana, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, I.P.G.S. (2020) “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Saham Minoritas Pada Perseroan Terbatas Yang Melakukan Merger,” Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(1), pp. 59–62.

Indonesia (atau Republik Indonesia) (2007) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Indonesia.

Kenny Obriga Jeremia N.A.M (2023) Prinsip Fiduciary Duty Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris, Hukum Online. Available at: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/fiduciary-duty-cl4058/.

Muhammad Alifia Aziz Rosadi (2025) “Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dalam tata kelola perusahaan,” Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 15(4).

Muhammad Rizki, Hamdani, R. (2021) “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DARI PENGGABUNGAN PERUSAHAAN ( MERGER ) PADA PERSERON TERBATAS DI INDONESIA,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, IV(April), pp. 40–51.

Panalaga, W.B. (2023) “Penerapan Asas Fiduciary Duty dan Piercing the Corporate Veil Terhadap Tanggungjawab Terbatas Direksi Suatu Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia dan Amerika,” UNES LAW REVIEW, 6(1), pp. 1967–1977.

Perdana, B.P. and Cahyaningsih, D.T. (2025) “Dinamika Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Minoritas dalam Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), pp. 159–164.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki (2010) Penelitian Hukum. Edited by Media Group. Jakarta.

Prakasa, A.W. and Sudarwanto, A.S. (2025) “Doktrin Fiduciary Duty : Peranannya sebagai Pedoman Pengurusan Perseroan Terbatas oleh Direksi,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2), pp. 241–247.

SIP Law Firm (2024) Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Saham Minoritas, SIP Law Firm. Available at: https://siplawfirm.id/pemegang-saham-minoritas/?lang=id.

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji (2000) Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Edited by U. Press. Jakarta.

Vella, A., Putra, N. and Muryanto, Y.T. (2016) “URGENSI IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,” Privat Law, IV(2), pp. 7–17.

Published
2026-02-07
How to Cite
Pangestu, L. C., Noer, Z., & Dara. (2026). PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS . Judge : Jurnal Hukum , 6(07), 2101-2108. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i07.2067