Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Debt Collector dalam Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Kendaraan
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 155 timesAbstract
Consumer protection stipulates that every consumer has the right to obtain legal protection and fair dispute resolution mechanisms, as provided in Article 4 letter (e) of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. In Indonesia, there has been a significant increase in public interest in purchasing vehicles through credit schemes offered by financing companies, which has given rise to various legal issues. In many cases, debtors experience default (wanprestasi). This condition has led most financing companies (leasing companies) to employ third parties, commonly referred to as debt collectors, to conduct debt collection activities against consumers (debtors). However, in practice, numerous incidents have occurred in which consumers’ fiduciary objects are forcibly repossessed due to delayed installment payments. This study examines the legal protection afforded to consumers in the repossession of fiduciary collateral objects, as well as the constraints and recommendations necessary to ensure compliance with the applicable laws and regulations. This research employs a normative juridical approach, conducted by examining statutory regulations related to the actions of debt collectors in the repossession of fiduciary objects. The results of the study indicate that the execution of fiduciary collateral objects may only be carried out if there is a voluntary agreement between the creditor and the debtor, or through a court decision. Therefore, actions undertaken by third parties or debt collectors that involve the forcible repossession of vehicles without a clear and lawful legal basis constitute a violation of the law.
References
Adrianto (2020) Manajemen Kredit: Teori dan Konsep Bagi Bank Umum. 1st edn. Edited by Q. Media. Pasuruan: CV. Penerbit Qiara Media.
BPS (2024) Jumlah Kendaraan Bermotor Menurut Provinsi dan Jenis Kendaraan (Unit), 2023, BPS. Available at: https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/VjJ3NGRGa3dkRk5MTlU1bVNFOTVVbmQyVURSTVFUMDkjMw==/jumlah-kendaraan-bermotor-menurut-provinsi-dan-jenis-kendaraan--unit---2022.html?year=2023.
Elvina, T.D. and Sulistiyono, A. (2025) ‘Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen terhadap Tindakan Kekerasan Debt Collector Pelaku Pinjaman Online’, Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(1), pp. 364–376. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5095.
Faniyah, I. and A, S.A. (2024) ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen dalam Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia oleh Debt Collector Akibat Wanprestasi Pada Perusahaan Pembiayaan’, Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), pp. 215–222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31933/fpt63m70.
Hardiansyah, F. (2022) ‘Pelaksanaan Parate Eksekusi Dalam Jaminan Fidusia Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 1(1), pp. 348–357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v1i1.1762.
Hasna farida and siti Malikhatun Badriyah, (2024) .Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Ditinjau dari Persfektif kreditor dan debt collector,Jurnal Notarius, pp 362-363. ejournal.undip.ac.id
Indradewi, A.A.S.N. (2020) Hubungan Konsumen Produsen, Asas, Tujuan & Aspek Hukum Perdata, Administrasi, Pidana. 1st edn. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.
Indriyanti, K.K. (2025) ‘Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(4), pp. 16–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v2i4.1161.
Khariatu, N.D. (2020) ‘Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen bagi Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan oleh Debt Collector’, Perspektif Hukum, 20(2), pp. 347–368. Available at: https://perspektif-hukum.hangtuah.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/84/69.
Mahkamah Konstitusi (2019) Putusan Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Available at: https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/peraturan/detail/11ead07d33892490bcb8303935313134.html.
Mayasari, I.S. and Octarina, N.F. (2020) ‘Kedudukan Hukum Pidana Atas Pengambilan Kendaraan Paksa Debitur Oleh Debt Collector Lembaga Pembiayaan’, Jurnal Rechtens, 9(2), pp. 141–152.
Mondoringin, R.A. (2024) ‘Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan Oleh Lembaga Pembiayaan Melalui Debt Collector Pasca Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII Tahun 2019’, Lex Privatum, 13(5).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2024) Pengaturan dan Pengawasan Perbankan, OJK. Available at: https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/ikhtisar-perbankan/Pages/Peraturan-dan-Pengawasan-Perbankan.aspx.
Riskawati, S. (2021) ‘RASIO DECIDENDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019 DAN PERUBAHAN KONSTRUKSI NORMA EKSEKUSI DAN WANPRESTASI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA’, ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(1), pp. 33–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i1.613.
Syafrida and Hartati, R. (2020) ‘Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU/XVII/2019’, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 8(5), p. 55. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.







