IMPLEMENTATION NOODWEEREXCESS IN PROVING EVIDENCE IN CASES OF ASSAULT (CASE STUDY OF THE DECISION AT THE MALILI DISTRICT COURT NO: 40/PID.B/2019/PN MLL)
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 6 timesAbstract
This study examines the application of the concept of noodweerexcess (excessive forced defense) in proving criminal cases of assault in Indonesia. The case study focuses on the Malili District Court Decision Number: 40/PID.B/2019/PN MLL. The background of this study is the importance of law enforcement based on justice, certainty, and legal benefits, as mandated by Pancasila as the philosophical basis of the Indonesian state. This article highlights the differences in views between the public prosecutor and the panel of judges regarding the application of Article 49 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code regarding noodweerexcess in this case. The author analyzes the legal facts revealed in the trial and the judge's considerations , and provides a critical view of the judge's decision that stated the defendant could not be convicted for using excessive forced defense. This study concludes that the application of Article 49 of the Criminal Code in this case is considered inappropriate because one of the elements of the article is not supported by the facts of the act as stated in the case file. The author also provides suggestions regarding improving coordination between law enforcement officers and accuracy in the application of the article
References
Achmad Ali, The Decline of Law in Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2002. p . 50.
Achmad Ali, Unveiling the Veil of Law: A Philosophical and Sociological Study, Jakarta: Toko
Adami Chazawi, Criminal Law Lessons II, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1st ed., 2002), 41.
Barda Nawawi Arief, Anthology of Criminal Law Policy (Development of the Drafting of the New Criminal Code), Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2008. P. 56.
Dominikus Rato, Philosophy of Law Seeking: Understanding and Understanding Law, (Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo), 2010, Page 59.
Darwan Prinst, Criminal Procedure Law in Practice, Djambatan: Jakarta, 1998. P. 133
Djoko Prakoso, Justiable Position in the Criminal Procedure Code, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1986, p. 86.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code: Criminal Procedure Code, Pradnya Paramitha: Jakarta, 1984. p . 11
Munir Fuady, Critical Legal School: The Paradigm of Legal Powerlessness, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2003, p. 40.
M. Agus Santoso, Law , Morals & Justice: A Study of Legal Philosophy, Second Edition, Kencana, Jakarta, 2014, p. 85
M. Ali Zaindan, Criminal Policy, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta, 2016. p . 111
Lawrence M. Friedman, Legal System (Social Science Perspective), Nusamedia, Bandung, 2009. p. 7.
Leden Marpaung, Elements of Punishable Acts (Crimes), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1991, 80-81.
Redha Mantovani et al., Criminal Procedure Code Complete with Changes to Articles Due to Constitutional Court Decisions and Other Procedural Provisions in Various Legislations, (UAI Press, 2019), Page 78.
Riduan Syahrani, Summary of the Essence of Legal Science, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999), Page 23.
Roeslan Saleh, Criminal Code, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1987 , p . 77.
Soerjono Soekanto, Factors Influencing Law Enforcement, PT. Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 1983, p. 45.
Soerjono Soekanto, Factors Influencing Law Enforcement, PT. Rajawali, Jakarta, 1983, p. 5.
Indonesian Attorney General's Office Training and Education Agency Module Compilation Team, Pre-Prosecution Module, Jakarta: Indonesian Attorney General's Office Education and Training Agency, 2019, p. 6
Utrecht. Introduction to Indonesian Law, PT. Ichtiar Baru: Jakarta, 1983 p. 418.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Principles of Criminal Law in Indonesia, (Bandung: Eressco, 1989), 78.
Zainal Abidin Farid, Criminal Law I, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007, 200. 26
Zainal Abidin Farid, Criminal Law I, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007), 200.
B. Papers and Journals
Angela A. Supit, Pre-Prosecution in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Impact of the Enactment of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, Jurnal Lex Crimen, Vol. V, No. 1, 2016, p. 100.
AI Shaleh & Wisnaeni. F, “The Relationship Between Religion and State According to Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia”, Indonesian Legal Development Journal, Edition Vol. 01., No. 02., May 2019, P. 240.
Fachrul Rozi, "Evidence System in the Trial Process of Criminal Cases," Jurnal Juridical Unaja, Vol. 01., No. 02, Pp. 19
Irwandi Samudra, FORCED DEFENSE THAT EXCEEDS THE LIMIT (NOODWEER EXCESS) IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC CRIMINAL LAW, Thesis, Islamic University of Indonesia, 2020
Komala Permatasari, Yogyakarta Community's Views on the Differentiation of Land Ownership for Non-Indigenous Indonesian Citizens Reviewed from the Perspective of Legal Sociology, Skipsi (Yogyakarta: FH Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2019), Page 22.
Marsudi Utayo, Murderer Who Defended Himself in Defending Honor and Property, Journal of Law, Palembang Youth Pledge School of Law, Volume 8 No. 2, July 2013
Rendy Marselino, Excessive Forced Defense (Noodweer Exces) in Article 49 Paragraph (2), Jurnal Jurist-Diction, Vol. 03., No. 02., 2020, Pp. 633-634.
Syafrudin Kalo, et al., Legal Analysis of Determining the Position of the Perpetrator's Witness as a Justice Collaborator in Narcotics Crimes at the Medan District Court (Decision Study No: 231/Pid.Sus/2015/Pn.Mdn), USU LAW JOURNAL Vol. 5 No. 3, Medan, 2017. p. 109. .
Wijayanti, PR, Application of Formal and Material Requirements in an Indictment Declared Obscur Libel and the Conformity of the Considerations of Supreme Court Judges in Accepting the Cassation Application in Supreme Court Decision Number 361. K/Pid. Sus/2008. Verstek Journal, Vol. 01 No. 01 2013. Pp. 148-158.
C. Laws and Decisions
Book Constitution Law Criminal
Constitution Number 8 Year 2010 About Prevention And Eradication Action Money Laundering Crime Money
Letter Demands Prosecutor Prosecutor General on Prosecutor's Office Country Semarang Number Reg. Case PDM-13/Semar/Epp.2/02/2016
Decision PN Semarang Number 56 / Pid.sus / 2016 / PN. SMG
Decision PT Semarang Number 198 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PT. SMG







